Why can't we understand the story before the expansion of the universe?
Suppose there are ten people in a room and they are far enough away from each other that they can move around freely and they can move their arms freely at this stage we can tell how they can move and can predict too.The laws are understandable, if the room starts to shrink and all the people start moving closer to each other due to lack of space, then there will come a time when they will bump into each other and become closer to each other. Wings cannot move, that is, now the laws of physics have collapsed(as an example)
If the room shrinks further, the original arrangement of all the individuals will be distorted and the movements of their arms will be misaligned. That is why we cannot understand the conditions of the smallest universe and the conditions before it, because our research begins with their investigation and the final conclusions are based on the same principles of physics.
Now try to imagine these below examples and try to conclude what about we are trying to understand.
Suppose you suddenly feel a bright light shining out of the darkness and you begin to stare at that light and feel that this light is gradually increasing and its magnitude is increasing with each passing moment.What do you think the birth of that spark was when you started seeing it?
No, but in fact, the birth of this spark had happened before the time you saw it.
Our mathematical web of cosmic expansion starts at the smallest point, the Big Bang. It may be that what we consider to be the sudden expansion of the universe is not sudden or sudden, but it has already been expanding in such a small to large state, and when it has reached the point of a mathematical net that we can understand, we will call it the same as "sudden expansion". Considering a sudden and sudden expansion from a point and calling it the Big Bang even though it is not.
Suppose we are looking at a drop in the air, and at the same place, far away, a particle is slowly growing larger than the head of an ant, and it is not visible to us at that time because it is so far away and so small, but As soon as it has grown as big as a football, we suddenly start seeing a small dot and we start saying look, a dot has just suddenly appeared or just born.
If we look at the above two examples in the context that as soon as we start to feel a sudden light in the dark or suddenly start to see a point in the sky, if we understand this suddenness as the Big Bang, we can think that it may have happened. That the universe may have existed before the Big Bang, the explanation of the Big Bang from these examples seems like an interesting and heartwarming idea, if you think about this explanation, the story of the universe beyond the Big Bang is really scary. seems to be
In science, predictions of the scientific method are made to understand the reality of a cosmic phenomenon or to arrive at its reality, and these predictions do not mean "future" predictions at all, but these predictions are predictions for each period of time. can be in the direction.
For example, thanks to the prophecies towards the past, the Big Bang and its circumstances and events were reached. The lack of prior information on this point in the universe, the Bang, is the biggest obstacle to making these predictions work and yield results.
Different scientists have different hypotheses about what was before the universe, but all are still waiting for a mathematical research to be done that can make predictions about the past using the information available after the Big Bang and those predictions. To prove or disprove would require evidence that existed before the Big Bang.
What was "before the beginning of the universe?" Will you ever get the answer?
This question is perhaps the biggest question of the present century and it is as big as it is difficult but it is also as big as it is interesting and inquisitive.
The answer to this question will surely be a great achievement.
For this question, scientists no longer have to stop at mere hypotheses, but have to create a universal mathematical network that accurately tells the events before the Big Bang. In this effort, scientists are busy preparing a network in which They are unifying all theories, i.e. a comprehensive theory that explains gravity and the laws of motion, and is being called the "Theory of Everything". With the help of this, a mathematical network can be created which will be able to explain all the cosmic phenomena and laws together and it is likely that this will make efforts to understand the Big Bang and the events before the Big Bang possible.
Ultimately, there is no way to predict whether all of this will really reveal the story of the universe before the Big Bang, or whether it will forever be assumed that there was nothing before the universe but this event. It just came into being out of nothing, that is, it was literally "born" out of nothing.
Man has never left any puzzle unsolved, his quest always motivates him, whatever is difficult and complex, man invests all his resources in solving it.
Fortunately, scientists are successfully developing a theory that could help underpin the theory of everything, called string theory, which describes the fundamentals of the universe on a scale smaller than elementary particles. It is an attempt to know and this is the place where everything is magical like the occurrence of automatic phenomena etc. and it also has a scary scary story hidden inside it.
What was the beginning of the universe and before the universe? In fact, this is a scary fact, now instead of turning a blind eye, scientists are trying to face it.
It may be that the age of the universe is 14 billion years from the mathematical calculation of the cosmic laws, by reversing the math of the expansion of the universe, it is only the birth of these cosmic laws, the age of these cosmic laws, and even before the Big Bang. There is such an orderly existence which cannot be called the universe but it is a unique form.


Comments
Post a Comment